Traditional Authority: Pros and Cons of Traditional Authority

Traditional authority (also called “traditional domination”) is when a person or organization has power or influence derived from long-standing customs, beliefs, or traditions. Power from traditional authority comes from people accepting the system’s legitimacy for a long period. You may feel someone’s power is legitimate because they have been in a position of authority throughout history or because it is a long-standing tradition.

The sociologist Max Weber was the first to define traditional authority as part of a larger classification system for types of authority based on sources of power and leadership styles. The Weberian system identifies traditional domination as one of three types of authority. The other two are charismatic authority, which is authority derived from a captivating personality, and rational-legal authority (also called “bureaucratic authority” or “legal authority”), which is power derived from a person’s office.

Traditional authority presents itself in many situations, including in modern society. The following are a few examples of traditional leaders:

• Inherited power: A person can come into power by inheriting a position from a family line. A good example is when a queen or king passes their authority down to their children.
• Patrimonialism: A form of traditional domination, patrimonialism is when a leader is the single source of authority and controls all matters based on their personal preferences. They might use military force to ensure their subjects meet their demands. They also have the choice to appoint their successor.
• Religious leaders: A religion may have leaders in place who receive power through a religious custom.

There are a few potential benefits to a traditional system of power and authority. Traditional authority:

1. 1. Can mean a simple transfer of power: When an economy and society has a traditional authority system, the rules for passing power from one person to another are straightforward.
2. 2. Makes it clear who has authority: While not everyone in a society, culture, or organization has to support a leader, a traditional power system eliminates the question of who is in the position of power. The rules of inheritance or transfer of power are clear to everyone.
3. 3. Supports the continuation of culture and tradition: When leadership remains constant in a family lineage or through an accepted system, the culture or customs may remain stable across generations. However, this power structure can also lead to the diminishment or erasure of the culture of groups who question the leader’s legitimate authority.

A system of traditional authority can have a few disadvantages for a culture or society. Traditional authority is:

1. 1. Difficult to dismantle: As a type of power deeply ingrained in tradition and culture, it is hard to end.
2. 2. Lack of qualifications: A traditional authority figure holds a position of power due to tradition or inheritance rather than their personal qualities or skills.
3. 3. Potentially restrictive: If a leader gains the legal right to assume an important role based on inheritance, a single group can remain in power for a long period, creating laws that serve only that constituency.

Get the MasterClass Annual Membership for exclusive access to video lessons taught by business luminaries, including Sara Blakely, Chris Voss, Robin Roberts, Bob Iger, Howard Schultz, Anna Wintour, and more.